On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 01:40:03PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > Those should both trip HTML_FONT_SIZE_TINY. > Unfortunately, that's a low scoring rule due to some FPs and limited number > of spam hits in the 3.0 corpus. The FPs may or may not be corpus pollution > based. *shrug*
Legit senders use tiny fonts. Looking at some of my rule FPs: CNET, Hersey's, L.L. Bean, Adidas, etc. Based on my last run, it's actually more of a ham rule apparently: OVERALL% SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME 93579 82015 11564 0.876 0.00 0.00 (all messages) 100.000 87.6425 12.3575 0.876 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %) 0.093 0.0805 0.1816 0.307 0.33 0.00 HTML_FONT_SIZE_TINY > The striping doesn't work with the font-size trick, as SA's body rules will > see "VIwhateverAGRA" for "VA<font size=0>whatever</font>AGRA". FYI, There's a BZ ticket open about that. Basically the code considers that stuff "invisible", but currently the body rules don't differentiate between visible vs invisible. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "Not a morning person" doesn't even begin to cover it.
pgp07SP3SFTiu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
