Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Thomas Booms wrote on Fri, 15 Jul 2005 10:29:35 +0200: > >> Content analysis details: (2.2 points, 2.0 required) > > Your problem is this setting. You should know by now from > following the list that this is stupid. So, why do you do that and > then ask for help? Set your spam threshold correctly and your FP > problem is gone. > > Kai
2.0 is indeed low. However, I would also notify the sending party, because their mail looks needlessly spammish. No plaintext content, no MIME-headers, a webbug, bad html/css... Using Bayes might help your problem and you can whitelist the sender. But with a 2.0 point-level for spam, you'll always gonna have some FP's. Kind Regards, Sander Holthaus
