Mike Jackson Tech Administrator, Datahost www.datahost.com
On my personal server, I'm running SA 3.0.4 with the user prefs, Bayes, and
AWL in a MySQL database (mostly because it would be "cooler" that way). On
my employer's server, I'm running the same SA version, but with file-based
DBs and user prefs. We're going to be rolling out doing filtering for all
our mailboxes (several hundred) as opposed to opt-in (as we're doing it now
on about 20 accounts). I know I could do benchmarks myself, but I wanted to
get your impressions if there's a performance improvement using SQL for
storage (user prefs, Bayes, AWL) rather than files. Thanks.
- Performance: files or SQL? Mike Jackson
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Cami
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Michael Parker
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Cami
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Michael Parker
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Justin Mason
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Michael Parker
- Re: Performance: files or SQL? Michael Parker