> I guess I should have asked the obvious question: > > "and if so, could you post it?"
Well, I'd hoped that the 'draconian' would detract from that idea. But
since you ask anyway, I went looking. And discovered that I *don't* have a
rule for this anymore! I'm just getting by on the SARE rules augmented by
Fred's rules.
However, if you want something like this, just off the top of my head:
header __HAS_TO To =~/\S/
body __HAS_BODY /\S/
meta EMPTY_MSG (!__HAS_TO && !__HAS_BODY)
Loren
