Sinks will work with SA, I have one pretty much ironed out for 2000/2003
-- a lot better than it was a year ago :) .. (pure perl -- PerlScript).

But I'm not sure how it will do on volume servers.  With my small
server/volume, it works well for me.  

P.S. to all that need it..  MS put out a COM object to programatically
add rules to mailboxes (Rule.dll - MSExchange.Rules - I think) as a MSDN
sample a few years back. It's not as robust as the rules wizard and
somewhat undocumented, but it can add a rule to watch the headers for
anything you like and move that message to somewhere else.  As an
Exchange Admin, you could loop through all the users' mailboxes and set
this rule up.  I've done so successfully for one organization.

The good/bad part of this is that users can't see this rule from the
rules wizard, so they can't modify/delete it unless they have a somewhat
low-level MAPI tool like Outlook SPY.

Steven

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben O'Hara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:50 AM
To: Kang, Joseph S.
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: SA and Exchange 5.5


On 6/10/05, Kang, Joseph S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ben O'Hara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 9:36 AM
> >
> > Anyways, Ive installed SpamAssassin and ClamAV on a dedicated
> > *nix box with exim which works great for filtering the
> > mail...however, id rather deliver ALL mail onto exchange and
> > have "spam" messages moved into a "SPAM" Folder within the
> > users Private Information Store.
> 
> We're in a similar situation here.  Exchange 5.5 with a *NIX relay
server
> running SA.  I've just told our users to create their own Outlook
rules to
> do that when they connect up to get their email.  Obviously, it
doesn't work
> as well if someone decides to access their messages via an alternate
client,
> but I figure if they're doing that they should be smart enough to set
up
> rules for whatever client it may be.
> 
> It's not fully automated but we're a small shop and about 95% of the
users
> connect to Exchange solely with Outlook.  The rest are smart enough to
do
> their own thing.  ;-)
> 
> -Joe K.
> 

Cheers Joe,
                 Id thought of this as a way around the problem
although i dont like the idea of having to manually add rules to
everyones outlook settings plus ensuring it gets done when someone new
starts!

It looks like i might have to use this solution until we can get
around to upgrading to Exchange 2003 which i believe is able to filter
using "sinks"

Cheers

Ben
-- 
"The Edge ... there is no honest way to explain it because the only
people who really know where it is are the ones who have gone over."

Hunter S. Thompson (1939-2005)

Reply via email to