Well, here's one that just got thru. if your SA doesn't block it, here it is-
Easy, convenient and discreet - order prescription drugs online. http://lpjth.bqe4xctm83tjxcb.bullionismia.com The higher the buildings, the lower the morals. People often grudge others what they cannot enjoy themselves. Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens. Matt Kettler wrote: > Kern, Tom wrote: >> I'm running sa 2.63 with spamcop_uri. >> I'm still getting mail thru that has url's pointing to know spammers. >> When I grep maillog for spamcop_uri, i see that its working but NOT >> for the emails that have been getting thru. The score for spamcop is >> 4, which is the same score i use to kill spam. I tag at 3. >> Yet its not killed or tagged. >> I'm running sa with amavisd-new. >> >> > > Ok... What's the problem here? Do you somehow expect spamcop URIBL to > never change? > > One thing to keep in mind is that spamcop URIBL is a very dynamic > test and it's contents change rapidly over time as new domains are > added and removed. It might not have a domain listed at the time you > receive the message, but hours, > minutes, or even seconds later it can be added automatically. (The SC > URIBL auto-updates every 5 or 15 minutes, I forget which.) > > Just because a message misses spamcop URI the first time around, but > later > matches it does not mean spamcop URI is being bypassed, it means it > was not in > the spamcop URIBL at that time.
