> Yes, a size limit is *required*.   It's very important to limit
> the size of messages scanned by SpamAssassin.

Well, we're limiting the size of emails that spamd sees now, maybe
that will "solve" the problem, and of course it's generally sensibly to
do this, as there isn't really much spam larger than lets say 250k,
but still, when scanning a single 10mb mail makes the spamd process dealing 
with that mail eat >2 gigabytes of main memory until all of it is exhausted, 
that doesn't seem like "normal" programm behaviour, does it?

What could it possibly do with that much memory for a 10mb mail? ;)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to