On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:49 -0500, David B Funk wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Raul Dias wrote: > > > SPF would never work if not there, right? > > Note that it does work, but not always. > > > > I have never see it fail from calling the spamassassin form the command > > line, just as spamd. > > It has enough permission for spamd to read it. > > > > Could it be that it happens because of some timeout issue, network issue > > (timeout) or not enough spamd children available makes it skips some > > tests? Or something like this? > > SPF requires one (or more) DNS lookups, so there's always the possbility > of network timeouts.
wouldn't this be logged ? -Raul Dias
