In an older episode (Monday 06 June 2005 21:17), Matt Kettler wrote: > wolfgang wrote: > > In an older episode (Monday 06 June 2005 20:08), Matt Kettler wrote: > > > >>I just recently received a run of spam which would push some system's > > > > scan-size > > > >>limit.
> If you use spamc, there's a default limit of 250k. see the spamc manpage for > command-line options to change this. thanks for pointing that out, we are using spamc. which limit would you recommend to scan the mails you mentioned? assuming the scan-size limit would be changed from default 250k to 1250k, how would that affect ressource consumption? thanks, wolfgang
