On Tuesday 31 May 2005 10:13, Loren Wilton wrote: > The spam you show is difficult to handle. One important thing is there is > no url or other link in the message body to a drug site where people could > get the spammed product. I am assuking the original spam much have had > such, since a spam without a link is fairly useless. If you are getting
I just quoted the biginning of the message... > > Next remove your existing bayes database and start over. You will need to > manually train it on at least 200 each ham and spam. If you make a couple > of mbox files, one with manually sorted spam, the other manually sorted > ham, and feed these to sa-learn correctly, you should be able to get bayes > working for you in no more than a day or two, probably only a few hours, > depending on your mail rate. > Sorry for the stupid question, but referring to the SpamAssassin web-site I could not get an answer to the following question: How do I safely remove my existing bayes database? > > That should get bayes on your side pretty quickly. > > The next thing that could help you is to enable net tests, specifically the > SURBL checks. These will catch a lot of your spams. > Isn't it enabled by default? I start spamd without any options. > Loren
