-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bruno Delbono wrote:

> I've found that recovering bayes berkeley db databases can be a
> very big chore and would suggest that you move to a proper SQL
> datbase (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite) as soon as possible.
> BerkeleyDB is horrible! Both in performance and reliability.
>
1) This is bordering on FUD.  Berkeley DB has it's uses, and as such
it is good to recognize those uses and use the right DB for the right
job.  For those interested, here is a benchmark of the various bayes
backend storage methods:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/BayesBenchmarkResults
You can judge for yourself how well each database performs.

2) I'm sorry, but I simply can not recommend SQLite as a backend store
for the bayes data.  Unless someone can prove me wrong, it's simply
not up to the task.

Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCm/dfG4km+uS4gOIRAoVpAJsFBwzF3bhIkXrqsBG3BjAS0ZqX1QCfRS6i
nfJwLAYz7C9ILdw/mcP568s=
=1ZEA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to