Raphael Clifford wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Actually, SpamAssassin 3.0.3 can't parse the first received header either, due to the @ in front of the IP. Even if you were to set trusted_networks all trusted would fire and there'd be no RBL lookups etc.

Daryl


I think that is exactly right. If you remove the '@' everything is fixed and the spam gets a very high score!

This parsing problem looks like something that would be fixable in spamassassin or does it classify as a mail server problem that shouldn't be worked around?

Raphael

SpamAssassin 3.1 will correctly parse the received header (with the @ in front of the IP). Until then, there may be a way to get qmail(?) to stop adding the @... I don't know for sure though.

Daryl

Reply via email to