Pat Traynor wrote: > > This seems like a lot of relatively standard porn terms that haven't > been recognized. Is this normal? Do I have to add my own rules to > catch this sort of stuff? > > --pat--
Normally bayes and URIBLs deal with this stuff, but it looks like your ISP isn't using bayes, and I can't tell if they have URIBLs on or not. You might want to consider grabbing the porn ruleset from www.rulesemporium.com to help out if you're not using bayes at all. Your message hit SARE_ADLTSUB2 and SARE_ADULT2. It's not going to get all the porn, but it's helpful.
