> -----Original Message----- > From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2005 9:26 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Evading URI checks > > > > > Go Here to Order Online: RxRealness.com > > > > > How would one go about adding checks for the omission of http:// ? > > > > It's something the SA developers have already considered, but it > > may be too resource intensive to check for every possible domain > > that doesn't have a URI method. Does this give spammers a way to > > advertise their domains without detection? Sure it does, but it > > also means they can't use clickable links, which may decrease > > their response rates. > > Its also not all that useful., at least in that particular > spammer's case. > I got one of those somewhat after the OP mentioned his. Mine > scored 19.2 > without any network checks. > > Loren
I consider this one a 'test' from the spammer to measure click thru rates. I imagine they stink. If it continues, I could always create a bigevil file just for those domains trying this trick ;) But as Loren mentioned, they already hit a heafty amount of other rules. --Chris
