Yes, but his scoring list BAYES_99 as one of the scores, which means bayes is active, which means it has been fed the necessary 200 spam and 200 ham. If it hadn't been fed the necessary spam and ham, it would not have been given a BAYES score at all. The fact that the mail was not autolearned could mean that it did not fall within the autolearn range OR that an identical message had already been learned. With a score like BAYES_99, it is probably the latter. >>> wolfgang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/13/2005 4:38 AM >>> In an older episode (Friday 13 May 2005 08:38), Geoff Sweet wrote:
> I would like to enable the Bayes system with auto-learning. I thought > that I had my config setup correctly but apparently I don't. My config > looks like this: > > ########## > # How we want to modify the email > rewrite_header subject [**SPAM**] > report_safe 0 > > #Bayes learning system > use_bayes 1 > bayes_auto_learn 1 In an older episode (Friday 13 May 2005 10:17), George Breahna wrote: > I really recommend you research your question before asking it. good point, anyway: man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf and http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html would tell you: bayes_min_ham_num (Default: 200) bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200) To be accurate, the Bayes system does not activate until a certain number of ham (non-spam) and spam have been learned. The default is 200 of each ham and spam, but you can tune these up or down with these two settings. for information how to learn the needed amount of mails, see man sa-learn regards, wolfgang |
- Re: Help with Bayes auto-learn wolfgang
- Re: Help with Bayes auto-learn Joe Zitnik
- Re: Help with Bayes auto-learn wolfgang
- Re: Help with Bayes auto-learn Matt Kettler