Re: memory-usage going BOOM

[Patrick von der Hagen]

Justin Mason wrote:
[...]
on 3.1.0 or 3.0.2?
3.0.2
[...]
Are you limiting the size of messages being passed to spamd?  Scanning
The limit is 200k.

as far as I know, there is not a remotely-exploitable bug here. Obviously
these would be more serious and we encourage those to be reported on the
bugzilla.
I have so far been unable to catch a sample message, causing the high 
memory-consumption, but I expect to be able to hunt for such emails 
tomorrow.


So far the cases we know of (and which have enough report detail to work
it out) are caused by massive on-disk DB files, or overlarge messages
being passed to spamd.
I don't use AWL and hat the problem both with and without Bayes, so 
there have been no DB-files involved.

--
CU,
   Patrick.