On Wednesday, May 4, 2005, 8:37:45 AM, martin smith wrote: M>>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
M>>A good way to report spams is to use SpamCop. The SpamCop M>>spamvertised site data goes into sc.surbl.org: M>> M>> http://www.surbl.org/lists.html#sc M>> > Jeff, does this include the links that don't resolve when parsed by spamcop? > There seem to be a lot that don't nowdays, would be nice to know that these > are still included, my main reason for reporting to spamcop is to get them > added to sc.surbl.org. > Martin I usually mention the ones that don't parse to the spamcop folks and they usually update their code accordingly. If you run across some you may want to mention them to them. They're usually pretty good about updates to catch new obfuscations. If you spot some new class of spams that SpamCop can't currently parse you may also want to mention it on the SURBL discussion list and we can proceed from there on the SURBL side: http://lists.surbl.org/ Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
