BAKONYI Péter - paha wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> not identified to be a spam because of some _negative_ points.
>> Can you post an X-Spam-Status header?
> thanks for your replies. here's an X-Spam-Status header from a
> message which was identified to be a spam before the new version and
> not spam right now:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.5 required=6.6
> tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX,
> EARN_PER_WEEK,HTML_50_60,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06,HTML_MESSAGE,
> HTML_WEB_BUGS autolearn=no version=3.0.2
It's the BAYES_00 rule that's doing you in. I suggest you wipe out your Bayes
database and carefully train it for a few weeks or until it starts to be more
accurate.
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
perl -e"map{y/a-z/l-za-k/;print}shift" "Jjhi pcdiwtg Ptga wprztg,"
