> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 07:24:07AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I know from watching that 3.1 might be a ways off, and am > wondering if > > based on anyone's experience whether running an interim > build is a good > > idea or not? I understand the risks of doing this in general, just > > wondering if the SA tree and development cycle is any more > or less likely > > to give us problems. > > > > I suppose that depends on your definition of a ways off. You should > start seeing pre-releases for 3.1 fairly soon (within a week I'd > guess). I've been running the 3.1 dev code for awhile on my server, > although it's low traffic box so your mileage may vary. > > As always, the more folks that get on board and test the current svn > code and then any of the pre an RC releases the faster we can find and > kill bugs. So, I encourage anyone who is willing and able to do so.
Well, I'm adventurous I guess. I just grabbed the latest nigthly snapshot, installed it on my computer, tested it slightly, installed in on our server, enabled parallel requests and so far it's running great. This is probably a good test since the DNS code has been rewritten and that's what was preventing running with parallel requests on Windows before. Only time will tell how stable this is. Besides the DNS rewrite, it seems the URI parsing code is better as it now can sort out escaped URLs better. It's looking very good guys! Bret
