Tuesday, February 25, 2025, 9:12:20 AM, you wrote:
MUf> Yeah, typical googlegroups.com spam.
MUf> This is abused for over a decade.
On 25.02.25 13:18, Niamh Holding wrote:
So maybe mail from googlegroups should no longer get a -1 score?
On 2025-02-25 at 08:27:58 UTC-0500 (Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:27:58 +0100) Matus
UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> is rumored to have said:
googlegroups get no score afaik.
The issue is that they work like a mailing list provider, that
produces negative score.
On 25.02.25 08:47, Bill Cole wrote:
It is absolutely feasible to exclude them from that rule.
That would make sense.
They are also listed as util_rb_2tld so you can't block them
globally, only subdomains of it.
It is possible to write a special rule just for them that doesn't use
that mechanism.
I will look at adding an extra condition in that meta-rule.
Looking at original post and my spam log, I'm not even sure if
googlegroups.com provides 3rd level domains at all.
I have blocked mail from googlegroups (googlegroups.com and
groups.google.com) long ago.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
How does cat play with mouse? cat /dev/mouse
