On 2025-02-25 at 08:27:58 UTC-0500 (Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:27:58 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
is rumored to have said:

Tuesday, February 25, 2025, 9:12:20 AM, you wrote:

MUf> Yeah, typical googlegroups.com spam.
MUf> This is abused for over a decade.

On 25.02.25 13:18, Niamh Holding wrote:
So maybe mail from googlegroups should no longer get a -1 score?

googlegroups get no score afaik.
The issue is that they work like a mailing list provider, that produces negative score.

It is absolutely feasible to exclude them from that rule.

They are also listed as util_rb_2tld so you can't block them globally, only subdomains of it.

It is possible to write a special rule just for them that doesn't use that mechanism.

I will look at adding an extra condition in that meta-rule.


I have blocked mail from googlegroups (googlegroups.com and groups.google.com) long ago.


--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
It's now safe to throw off your computer.


--
 Bill Cole
 b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
 Not Currently Available For Hire

Reply via email to