On 16/02/2025 01:07, Bill Cole wrote:
On 2025-02-15 at 07:42:44 UTC-0500 (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:42:44 +0100)
wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn <mehlhorn@wissen.online>
is rumored to have said:
Hi Bill,
so do you have another idea?
Hi Stefan,
No, I do not, aside from the implicit starting point: do not send spam.
Make sure every recipient is an individual who has asked for your email
and wants it, to the greatest degree possible. If you cannot do that,
nothing anyone can tell you will fix your deliverability. SpamAssassin
is not designed to allow "legitimate" bulk unsolicited email. Users who
want that should whitelist the spammers of whom they approve and avoid
showing it to SA.
Relevant to avoiding having your email seen as spam by SpamAssassin,
sending less spam-like email and finding a new and better domain name
are the full extent of my deliverability advice. I understand that
these recommendations are not easily implemented for an established
organization.
errrr. the problem is the dynamic style address block, not spam. PBL is
a list that is essentially a DUL.
Benny (for once) gave the *only* sensible answer, get an IP that is
static and not in a PBL (DUL/Dynamic style) address pool and get proper
A/AAAA and matching PTR records.
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
