Well, if those scores are changed to make them smaller I'll change them back and
am prone to making keyboard mistakes like changing a 1 to a 3 or the like. You
are using a trash TLD. Why do you presume you will get non-trash results? You
are getting boring.
{^_^}
On 20250215 09:33:18, wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn wrote:
Hello Bill,
Thank you for taking the trouble to reply to me again and summarize your
position.
I have read all your advice and understood it. The crazy thing is that we are
flagged on SA when we send a single email, but not on Google ..., for example,
and our emails go through perfectly.
We never send mass emails as a matter of principle!
Our problem lies in the massively over-rating of these 2 points:
FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.999
PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999
And that is really bad.
I would like to see a whitelist on SA so that reputable companies can register
there. As idea.
Thank you for your time and the thoughts you have shared with me.
Best wishes from Germany
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bill Cole [mailto:billc...@apache.org]
Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Februar 2025 16:08
An: wissen.online | Stefan Mehlhorn<mehlhorn@wissen.online>; SpamAssassin
Users<users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our TDL
Domain
On 2025-02-15 at 07:42:44 UTC-0500 (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 13:42:44 +0100) wissen.online |
Stefan Mehlhorn<mehlhorn@wissen.online> is rumored to have said:
Hi Bill,
so do you have another idea?
Hi Stefan,
No, I do not, aside from the implicit starting point: do not send spam.
Make sure every recipient is an individual who has asked for your email and wants it, to
the greatest degree possible. If you cannot do that, nothing anyone can tell you will fix
your deliverability. SpamAssassin is not designed to allow "legitimate" bulk
unsolicited email. Users who want that should whitelist the spammers of whom they approve
and avoid showing it to SA.
Relevant to avoiding having your email seen as spam by SpamAssassin, sending
less spam-like email and finding a new and better domain name are the full
extent of my deliverability advice. I understand that these recommendations are
not easily implemented for an established organization.
Also, please keep all SA discussion on-list. I am unable to provide private
consultation of any sort.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bill Cole [mailto:sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2025 22:33
An:users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Request for Whitelisting or Spam Score Adjustment for our
TDL Domain
On 2025-02-13 at 13:25:44 UTC-0500 (Thu, 13 Feb 2025 19:25:44 +0100)
Benny Pedersen<m...@junc.eu> is rumored to have said:
https://matrix.spfbl.net/90.186.69.50
move avay from this ip
What *evidence* do you have for the OP using that IP to connect to
hosts other than his own mailserver?
As far as I can see, there is no way that this could be the source of
his problem, because he's using that address to submit mail to his
mail server, not to transport it to other domains.
The domain SPF record does not include it. You showed an
Authentication-Results header, but that was generated by the OPs own
mail server (mail.wissen.online) and it was clearly a normal
authenticated mail SUBMISSION, for which no sanely-run system would
reject his mail. SA would not look at that handoff in any way and
neither should any spam filter.
fun part is that abusic whitelist pbl ips, just in case it helps
stop fokus on tld, the important is pbl listed ip
NO. You are focused on an irrelevancy.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com orbillc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo@toad.social and many *@billmail.scconsult.com
addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
--
Bill Cole
