On 2024-09-24 at 09:13:16 UTC-0400 (Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:13:16 -0400) Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> is rumored to have said:
> On 2024-09-24 at 04:18:06 UTC-0400 (Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:18:06 +0200) > Matthias Leisi <matth...@leisi.net> > is rumored to have said: > (Quoting me) >>> >>> people who don't configure it correctly, in a way that is *almost >>> invisible.* The lower rate limit which they established in March of this >>> year isn't inherently bad, it just meant that enough people were hitting >>> the limit that someone bothered opened a bug about it. >>> >> >> There is none new rule. The limit of 100‘000 per 24 hours has been in place >> for years. > > That's an interesting assertion. The page I cited has apparently changed in > the past day and the previous statement of a new policy has vanished. I'm > happy with assuming that it was an error that you've corrected. I WAS WRONG. The apparent explanation for that error is that I had both of these pages opened and somehow conflated them. https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS?language=en_US https://www.dnswl.org/?p=120 I am sorry for suggesting that this was a change, as it was clearly entirely my error. I have corrected the error in the rules file comment. Sadly, sent mail is forever... -- Bill Cole
