On Thursday, July 04, 2024 02:01 AEST, Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> wrote:
> Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 15:54:
>
> > header AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS eval:check_authres_result('dkim', 'pass')
> > header USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST eval:check_for_dkim_whitelist_from()
>
> keep scores of them neutral
>
> meta MY_DKIM_FAILS_NOTRUST (AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS && USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST)
> describe MY_DKIM_FAILS_NOTRUST Meta: AUTHRES_DKIM_PASS &&
> USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
> score MY_DKIM_FAILS_NOTRUST -1 -1 -1 -1
>
> i say no trust since authres can be fooled by untrusted AR headers, when
> authres_networks all is in use
I understand this, thank you.
>
> > and generate -100 that the DKIM plugin assigns to a DKIM
> > pass/USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST entry.
>
> why ? are you sure -100 is a very good idea ?
Selected as that is the score allocated by USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST
>
> > …but I don't know how to do that properly. I can combine into a meta
> > rule, but that will call the existing DKIM plugin's subroutine to
> > evaulate USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST, and I'm not sure if that will work.
>
> need more info on your mta setup, if postfix then i need postconf -nf
> and postconf -Mf in private mail, as i see you can :)
--
Simon Wilson<br />M: 0400 121 116
