On 03.07.24 23:54, Simon Wilson via users wrote:
Simon Wilson via users skrev den 2024-07-03 14:56:
Do I also need to disable the normal SA DKIM plugin evaluation, i.e.
trusting my upstream authres_trusted_authserv only?
both works in paralel, so no need to disable, best results came from
both enabled
its up to you to add more authres_trusted_authserv or more
authres_ignored_authserv lines
possible we can now have a very long debate on dmarc plugin ? :)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2024-07-03 16:14:
Please, Simon, quote the text you are replying to.
On 03.07.24 17:47, Benny Pedersen wrote:
i am not Simon
...I was not replying to you then.
Simon does not quote text he replies to, so it's hard to see who has written
what.
compare your:
https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg111627.html
to Simon's:
https://www.mail-archive.com/users@spamassassin.apache.org/msg111628.html
my question is does spamassassin dmarc plugin use authres results ?
not yet.
also what i feared, but it should imho do
also authres does imho not have spf_helo testing
Do you know anything that adds spf_helo to Authentication-Results ?
afaik pyspf-milter adds helo information only for DSNs
have dmarc ?
yes
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Honk if you love peace and quiet.
