> On Jun 3, 2024, at 4:09 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
>
> I forgot to add that I have "lowered" (increased to small negative number)
> scores for RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_*, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_* and RCVD_IN_IADB_*
> because I has similar bad experience with them.
Matus, if you EVER have a bad experience with RCVD_IN_IADB_ (or any other IADB
test), *please* let me personally know asap. We take our responsibility to the
receiving industry *very* seriously (always have, for more than 20 years now) -
that's *why* we invented the data response code concept, and developed it
specifically so that SA could take advantage of it (and didn't patent it so
that others could use the concept to, again, assist receivers). So, *please*,
again, let me know personally, directly, if you ever find an issue with a
certified sender (that is who would trigger the IADB tests) not doing the right
thing!
Thank you,
Anne
---
Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Internet Law & Policy Attorney
CEO Institute for Social Internet Public Policy (ISIPP)
Author: Section 6 of the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (the Federal email marketing law)
Creator of the term 'deliverability' and founder of the deliverability industry
Author: The Email Deliverability Handbook
Board of Directors, Denver Internet Exchange
Dean Emeritus, Cyberlaw & Cybersecurity, Lincoln Law School
Prof. Emeritus, Lincoln Law School
Chair Emeritus, Asilomar Microcomputer Workshop
Counsel Emeritus, eMail Abuse Prevention System (MAPS)
