> Matus UHLAR - fantomas <[email protected]> hat am 25.10.2023 16:11 CEST > geschrieben: > > > >Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2023-10-25 09:36: > >>I have: > >>50_scores.cf:score DKIM_VALID -0.1 > >> > >>check if you really haven't set score for DKIM_VALID anywhere, since > >>SA complains about it being zero. > >> > >>I guess this may cause DKIM_INVALID misfiring > > On 25.10.23 13:08, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >imho no, DKIM_INVALID have 0.1 in score, both should not be changed > > > >its just a result tag, not a policy of any kind > > This looks like OP has changed score of DKIM_VALID to 0: > > > >Oct 25 07:10:54.364 [1687666] info: rules: meta test DKIM_INVALID has > > >dependency 'DKIM_VALID' with a zero score > > and since DKIM_INVALID depends on it: > > meta DKIM_INVALID DKIM_SIGNED && !DKIM_VALID > > ...it would make sense DKIM_INVALID to hit whenever DKIM_SIGNED does > since DKIM_VALID apparently was made not to fire ever.
Thanks for your help everybody. After further inspection I found a file that must originated a long time ago. The problem with inherited systems. I grepped only the files I usually modify (local.cf and some files that have a common file-name prefix for custom files) and in /var/lib/spamassassin After greping more thoroughly I found the perpetrator. Thanks a lot again, Niels
