On 20231024 23:46:18, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
Matus UHLAR - fantomas<uh...@fantomas.sk> hat am 25.10.2023 08:16 CEST geschrieben:On 25.10.23 07:21, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:I'm having here a mail that scores as DKIM_INVALID. I tried sending the same mail to gmail for example and it tells me that DKIM is valid. Now I put it through "spamassassin -D" and I am even more baffled because the debug seems to say that DKIM is valid but then scores as INVALID. Any idea why this could be? debug-output from "spamassassin -t -D dkim < message": Oct 25 07:10:52.341 [1687666] dbg: dkim: VALID DKIM,i=@my.domain.com, d=my.domain.com, s=inx, a=rsa-sha256, c=relaxed/relaxed, key_bits=2048, pass, matches author domain Oct 25 07:10:52.342 [1687666] dbg: dkim: signature verification result: PASS Oct 25 07:10:52.342 [1687666] dbg: dkim: adsp not retrieved, author domain signature is valid Oct 25 07:10:52.342 [1687666] dbg: dkim: adsp result: - (valid a. d. signature), author domain 'my.domain.com' Oct 25 07:10:52.352 [1687666] dbg: dkim: VALID signature by my.domain.com, autho...@my.domain.com, no valid matches Oct 25 07:10:52.352 [1687666] dbg: dkim: autho...@my.domain.com, not in any dkim whitelist Oct 25 07:10:54.125 [1687779] info: util: setuid: ruid=0 euid=0 rgid=0 0 egid=0 0 Oct 25 07:10:54.364 [1687666] info: rules: meta test DKIM_INVALID has dependency 'DKIM_VALID' with a zero scoredid you set score of DKIM_VALID do 0 ?DKIM_VALID is not overwritten by any of my local rules. So I would expect that this is the case. But even if I set for example score DKIM_VALID 0 in local.cf there is no change Best, Niels
Methinks you have here a very good clue to set a non-zero value, perhaps (most likely), a modest negative score.
{o.o} Diving back into obscurity
