Henrik K <h...@hege.li> writes: > From what I've seen, it's very uncommon to use this format. Why rely on > some vague previously defined score, which can change at any time? Just set > a static score you like and fits your system.
It's not vague; it's the score which is defined by the distributed rules. My intent is to say that I want 1 point more than what the rules say, and I mean that to float with rule changes. Perhaps you are arguing that all uses of () are confused and thus we should lean to removing that facility. Anyway, once I figured out that () will confusingly fail with some rules (that just show up as if they are normal in score reports), it was easy to fix. Thank you all for the comments and explanations.
