Since 3.0.1 we have had great success with SA and MySQL.  In production
we have a decent MySQL server serving two separate Servers running SA
which in turn are used by 4 frond end relays.

All in all I think it's a good solution if you need a central database
shared between multiple instances.  It does give you the chance to run
queries against it as well to derive some statistical information.  We
use it for both Bayes and AWL.

Performance isn't bad either.  Our most recent dev environment is
currently on 1 box (RHEL 4, SA 3.0.2) and we have been slamming it with
a fairly good load for about 3 days now and it's been working great.

Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven W. Orr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 11:38 AM
To: spamassassin-users
Subject: Question about spamassassin using MySQL

I just found out that because I use spamassassin/sendmail and 
spamass-milter, I have to use a sitewide bayes database. I also found
out 
that as an alternative I can use MySQL to be the Bayes DB. I'm a little 
leery of tying my sendmail functionality to MySQL. Can people tell me
what 
they think of this idea? I guess I'm wondering what the paramterizations

are that would make me decide to go this way (or not).

TIA

-- 
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things
have  .0.
happened but none stranger than this. Does your driver's license say
Organ ..0
Donor?Black holes are where God divided by zero. Listen to me! We are
all- 000
individuals! What if this weren't a hypothetical question?
steveo at syslang.net

Reply via email to