Nestor Burma wrote: >Hello, > >We just got some "obvious" spam going through SA. This >mail does include a not-quite obfuscated URL, which is > > >---------- >Strange thing is that no URIBL rules are triggered. >But if we change HTTP to http, or WWW to www (or >both), those rules are properly triggered. >
See the bugzilla bug on this issue, there's a patch in it: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4111
