On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Grant Taylor wrote:
On 12/23/20 9:55 PM, John Hardin wrote:
Did you see my mention of this earlier?
Yes, I did see it.
That's a bit more invasive of a change than I was hoping to do for this task.
I had been waiting to reply to your earlier message to test some things that
you recommended.
As you will see in my recent reply, I do believe that I've managed to achieve
most of what I wanted to do.
Good.
I did notice from your earlier description that you (weakly) wanted to
completely bypass SA scanning for those automated messages, which makes
sense from a resource management perspective. The milter proxy would be
the way to do that, as it would give you a way to bypass spamass-milter
based on recipient (or more reliably sender + recipient).
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with /etc/sendmail.cf, "it never
does quite what I want. I wish Christopher Robin was here."
-- Peter da Silva in a.s.r
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Christmas
