Dear Dave,The purpose of setting a priority higher than the RBL check is the
run that meta before the DNS queries and if there is a match to stop additional
tasks.Best Regards,Iulian Stan
-------- Original message --------From: Dave Funk
<dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu> Date: 12/23/20 22:01 (GMT+02:00) To:
users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Bypass RBL checks for specific
address That may not work for what the OP wanted.Because it's assumed that DNS
related stuff may take some time those rules (if configured to run) are
launched early in the processing of a message.So if the OP wants to completely
avoid running RBL checks (as opposed to just ignoring their scores/results) he
may need to do some special tricks.One thing would be to have a separate SA
instance with its own configuration which has the RBL stuff removed and then
configure his MTA to select that particular SA filter when the special user
address is detected.This begs the question, what is the need to completely
avoid running RBL checks for that special recipient?What is supposed to happen
when a message comes in that is addressed to multiple recipients, including the
special recipient?This could get messy.On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Iulian Stan wrote:>
Hello all,> > You can create a meta rule with very high prio(actually check to
be higher than your RBL), match what you need> from email headers and than use
shortcircuit to skip additional tests.> > > Best regards,> Iulian Stan> > > >
Sent from my Galaxy> > > -------- Original message --------> From: Grant Taylor
<gtay...@tnetconsulting.net>> Date: 12/23/20 20:59 (GMT+02:00)> To:
users@spamassassin.apache.org> Subject: Re: Bypass RBL checks for specific
address> > On 12/22/20 11:56 PM, Axb wrote:> > whitelist_to ?> > My
understanding is that whitelist_to, more_spam_to, and all_spam_to> behave the
same way and effectively just alter the scoring offset.> > It seems as if the
tests are still run, and it's just the score is> artificially offset based on
which setting is used.> > I'm wanting to not run RBL tests for the specific
recipient email address.> > > > --> Grant. . . .> unix || die> > >-- Dave Funk
University of Iowa<dbfunk (at)
engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering319/335-5751 FAX:
319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center, 103 S Capitol
St.Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527#include
<std_disclaimer.h>Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
