On Tuesday, April 12, 2005 @ 12:14:02 PM [-0700], Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:10:19PM -0400, Jim Maul wrote: >> Sort of. You wanted to count them, while it sounds as if this poster >> just wants to detect them. There is a big difference there.
> BTW: detecting them accurately is actually pretty difficult depending > on what kind of mails you get. > FYI: 3.1 is going to have semi-generic obfuscation support that will > look for certain words being obfuscated (you can trivially add your > own words as new rules...) There's 2 versions right now that are being > merged down into 1 for the release. :) Great! Thanks. > Randomly Generated Tagline: > Futurama is brought to you by Thompson's Teeth, the > only teeth strong enough to eat other teeth. And the above sent a diet coke through my nose. Classic. -- Matt
