Of course the License allows forking. We are an Apache Project and use the
ASLv2.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020, 06:43 Mauricio Tavares <raubvo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 6:07 AM jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > Please Marc, stick to technical merit for your argument. Getting nasty
> does not
> > solve technical problems, which we have here. Attacks are not going to
> solve
> > anything. Rational arguments may not. But, they should be made just the
> same.
> > Then the open source developers will go off and do what they (think
> they) want.
> > The job is to lead them to thinking they want something different for
> what they
> > see as good reasons. Personally I believe the change is a technical
> failure and
> > will not provide the social results they seem to desire. They should
> think about it.
> >
> I would like to add that if this is perceived to cause technical
> issues certain members of the community believe outweighs any
> perceived non-technical benefits, these members have the right to
> check if the current spamassassin license allows for forking. And if
> that is the case, they have the right to fork it out.
>
> After all, someone said "A right delayed is a right denied."
>
> > {o.o}
> >
> > On 20200714 02:57:19, Marc Roos wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >> To you and others spouting off, be reminded that this is a publicly
> > > archived mailing list and you
> > >> will be on the wrong side of history. Consider that when you post.
> > >
> > > You must be feeling like a king in your little PMC? Who are you to
> judge
> > > whom is on the wrong side of history. No wonder people raise questions
> > > here, with someone like you deciding things. I think the PMC should
> > > disqualify your vote.
> > >
>
