BAYES_40 will slightly lower the score. However I'd think that
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET should crank up the score by a good amount and more
than compensate for bayes.
Loren
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Gerdes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 3:37 AM
Subject: Local scores
> *** Before acting on this email or opening any attachment you are advised
to read the disclaimer at the end of this email ***
>
> Could someone please explain this for me:
>
> Header from an e-mail I received:
> ―---------------------------------8<------------------------------
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on
cesium.whl.co.uk
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.6 required=5.6
tests=BAYES_40,DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
> RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET autolearn=no version=3.0.2
> X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Mon, 01 Nov 2004 09:10:08 +0000)
> ―---------------------------------8<------------------------------
>
> Note that the total score is 4.6
>
> Excerpt from my local.cf:
> ―---------------------------------8<------------------------------
> score GTUBE 120.0
> score RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 5.0
> ―---------------------------------8<------------------------------
>
> Note that I've scored up RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET to 5.0.
>
> I know that the other local scores work OK becuause I can sent GTUBE in
for a pretty large score
>
> Cheers
> Jon Gerdes
>
>
> *** Disclaimer ***
> The information contained in this E-Mail and any subsequent correspondence
may be subject to the Export Control Act (ECA) 2002. The content is private
and is intended solely for the recipient(s).
> For those other than the recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution,
or action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance on such information is
prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> If received in error please return to sender immediately.
>
> Under the laws of England misuse of information that is subject to the ECA
2002, is a criminal offence.
