On Friday 01 April 2005 10:52 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> >I subscribe to the EFF Newsletter, it keeps repeatedly getting tagged as
> > spam. I've put the 'from' address in my manual whitelist which has helped
> > to lower the score to a tad above my spam threshold of 5.0. I've saved
> > some of the previous editions and am wondering if I ran sa-learn --ham on
> > these would it eventually make enough of a difference to have these
> > tagged as ham?
>
> That depends a LOT on what rules caused it to be tagged in the first place.
>
> Without a X-Spam-Status example, nobody can do anything but speculate.

Below are the headers from a newsletter I received tonight,  and those from 
last night.  There are a couple of differences last nights gave 0.8 for the 
auto-whitelist, while tonights gave -0.0, last nights only hit on PYZOR while 
tonights hit on PYZOR and DCC:

 From: EFFector list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Reply-To: EFFector list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: *****SPAM(5.7)***** EFFector 18.11a: Diebold, Choicepoint to Offer 
Voting Technology
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Organization: EFF
 XData: 1010,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-ELNK-AV: 0
 X-Spam-Prev-Subject: EFFector 18.11a: Diebold, Choicepoint to Offer Voting 
Technology
 X-Spam-DCC: servers cpollock.localdomain 1049; Body=1 Fuz1=many Fuz2=many
 X-Spam-Flag: YES
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on 
        cpollock.localdomain
 X-Spam-Level: *****
 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,DCC_CHECK,
        DIGEST_MULTIPLE,PYZOR_CHECK autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
 X-Spam-Report: 
        *  0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.5000]
        *  3.5 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
        *  2.2 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
        *  0.1 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check
        * -0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list

And last nights:

From: EFFector list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 Reply-To: EFFector list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: *****SPAM(5.2)***** EFFector 18.11: Supreme Court Justices Grill 
Both Sides at Copyright Hearing
 Mime-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Organization: EFF
 XData: 1010,[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-ELNK-AV: 0
 X-Spam-Prev-Subject: EFFector 18.11: Supreme Court Justices Grill Both Sides 
at Copyright Hearing
 X-Spam-DCC: cpollock.localdomain 1074; Body=1 Fuz1=83 Fuz2=79
 X-Spam-Flag: YES
 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on 
        cpollock.localdomain
 X-Spam-Level: *****
 X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,PYZOR_CHECK,
        SARE_MILLIONSOF,SARE_MONEYTERMS autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2
 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
 X-Spam-Report: 
        *  0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
        *  0.3 SARE_MILLIONSOF BODY: Millions of something.
        *  0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
        *      [score: 0.5000]
        *  3.5 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor (http://pyzor.sf.net/)
        *  0.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
-- 
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
20:33:34 up 19 days, 1:08, 1 user, load average: 0.42, 0.34, 0.46
Mandrake Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you talk to God, you are praying; if God talks to you, you have
schizophrenia.
                -- Thomas Szasz
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to