On Sun, March 17, 2019 22:57, James wrote: > On 2019-03-17 5:46 p.m., John Capo wrote: > >> On Sun, March 17, 2019 17:03, James wrote: >> >>> I've been getting a lot of spam so I'm thinking of lowering the >>> "required" number. >>> >>> >>> >>> About 50 % spam gets a 4.4 so my required=4.5 is a tiny bit high. >>> > > I run an IMAP server with my own spamassassin. > I have over 60 folders I was running sa-learn --ham on. > I was also running sa-learn --ham on my .Sent folder. > I have 2 other folders, one of ham and one for missed spam. > I put messages manually in these folders. > > >> >> What is the Bayes score for the missed spam? >> > This is from a missed spam. > How do I see the bayes score? > > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) > X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, > DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_NONE, > SPF_HELO_PASS,T_REMOTE_IMAGE,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no > autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
score BAYES_50 0 0 2.0 0.8 The BAYES_50 test would contribute 0.8 to the total score with network tests enabled and you are using the 3.4.2 defaults. BAYES_50 means 40% to 60% chance its spam. John
