On 2/14/19 6:02 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
VFE isn’t to blame for the hack, but they are to Balme for losing all the data,.
Maybe.If VFE had backups stored off-site via something like Amazon Glacier with no normal in-band connectivity between the main systems and the backups, and the hacker went out of their way to delete the backups, I don't think I could hold /that/ against VFE.
If VFE had backups on a NAS that was mounted on the system that was attacked such that an rm -Rf / would destroy them, then sure, I can hold /that/ against VFE.
I think we need to know more than we presently do to be able to decide how accountable VFE really is.
-- Grant. . . . unix || die
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
