From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > in a degree I have set my SA score to be more or less equal with the
> > BAYES_99 score (around 8).
>
> Your BAYES_99 score is 8? I would never do this. General rule is that no
single
> rule should be able to mark a message as ham or spam. That cries for false
> positives.
I'd not do that with Bayes scores. However, there are a few rules that
are iron clad spam detectors here and they get VERY high scores. They
are unique to me and uniquely usable by me so I don't bother to pass
them along. (I have a string if wrong names associated with products
people spam me about that I use to send a score well over 5 to SA. And
I have some additional PayPal antispam of my own which involve some
fancy dancing with meta rules that get an automatic 105 to make sure
they never get through to anything but my spam folder. I do scan the
spam folder, though. If I didn't scan it I'd not be so vicious about
some of my spam scores.
{^_-}
