On 1 Jan 2018, at 11:41 (-0500), Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
the gross format in RFCs 822,2822 and 5322 describes message-id
consisting
of local and domain part, thus is must contain "@".
On 01.01.18 12:17, Bill Cole wrote:
No, it does not. Re-read the cited sections. From RFC5322, the ABNF
definition:
msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS]
this is the part that says message-id must consist of local and domain
parts. It just says it implicitly, not explicitly, but:
It's not possible to construct Message-Id without the "@" while conforming
to any of mentioned RFCs.
Also note that if you demand that MIDs contain '@' with conforming
strings on both sides, you risk losing mail that users want. This is
a mistake I have made.
what exactly was the problem? Message-Id without the "@" or the
non-conforming parts there?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Your mouse has moved. Windows NT will now restart for changes to take
to take effect. [OK]
