-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: very basic SA-Learn performance question: is 90 seconds or so per token really, really slow or roughly normal? From: Kevin Golding <k...@caomhin.org> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Date: Tue Oct 31 2017 11:44:20 GMT+0300 (AST)
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:35:08 -0000, David Gessel <ges...@blackrosetech.com> > wrote: > >> 1) sa-learn seems really, really slow. Slow enough that spam sometimes >> comes in faster. This seems far slower than the benchmark results suggest >> is within the range of normal. I'm sure I'm doing something really wrong, >> but not sure what. > > sa-learn is more suited to individual or small batches of messages. You'll > get significantly improved performance using spamc -L spam (or ham, or > forget). Thank you - I will definitely try this.
