On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:35:08 -0000, David Gessel <ges...@blackrosetech.com> wrote:

1) sa-learn seems really, really slow. Slow enough that spam sometimes comes in faster. This seems far slower than the benchmark results suggest is within the range of normal. I'm sure I'm doing something really wrong, but not sure what.

sa-learn is more suited to individual or small batches of messages. You'll get significantly improved performance using spamc -L spam (or ham, or forget).

Reply via email to