On Wednesday, March 9, 2005, 6:20:10 PM, Robert Menschel wrote: > Tuesday, March 8, 2005, 8:44:43 PM, Daryl wrote:
>>> Assumption: This activity will focus only on public newsletters, >>> services, etc., which normally do not contain any private >>> information. Therefore there will not be any privacy or >>> confidentiality concerns for the great majority of emails from >>> these sources. DCWOS>> What about emails from banks etc? I'd think they'd be a good DCWOS>> candidate for something you want to whitelist based on their DCWOS>> received headers or SPF. > Excellent class of whitelist entities, and with high > privacy/confidentiality concerns. I don't want people sending banking > userids or passwords or such around by email. [...] DCWOS>> Then again I don't know how many submissions you are expecting, DCWOS>> so that may be overkill. > Over time I would expect many hundreds -- all banks, credit unions, > airlines, hotel chains, retail chains, newspapers, major magazines, > major NPOs, etc. > Bob Menschel If there are going to be different sources and different reasons for whitelisting, it will probably be useful to take note of that source/reason info for each record. If that's a comment after each record, or a field in a database, or both, it would probably be helpful for managing these records in the long run. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
