I had sorbs in airmax.cf and frenchrules.cf and have uncommented these rules. Why is sorbs a no-show? Is something wrong with sorbs?
No, sorbs is still in SA, there's just no RCVD_IN_SORBS rule anymore.. That rule used to show up if any sorbs list matched any IP in the email, including sorbs DUL for legitimately relayed mail. It's primary purpose was not to assign points, but to trigger a DNS query that could be used by the other sorbs rules.
To prevent further questions about why RCVD_IN_SORBS "misfired" on properly relayed dialup mail it got renamed to __RCVD_IN_SORBS. This results in it running with 0 score, and not showing up in the hits list.
This way only the specific sub-lists of sorbs show up with a score, but the top-level rule has no score and doesn't show up in the hits list.
Whats the directive to change the score set?
There is no "directive" to change score sets. The Score set is picked based on what features are enabled. Since the AWL learns on a "no bayes" basis, that automatically causes a shift in score set used.
The four scoresets in SA are:
Set 0 - used if neither network nor bayes tests are enabled Set 1 - used if network tests are enabled, but bayes is not Set 2 - Used if bayes tests are enabled, but network tests are not Set 3 - Used if both bayes and network tests are enabled.
