David Guntner wrote on Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:38:31 -0800: > From the line about URIDNSBL, and the lack of a complaint > about Net::DNS not being there, I'm thinking that SpamAssassin is happy now. >
Looks good :-) > Is there something I can do, though, to verify that the DNSBL check is > actually *happening*? I'm going to go with starting up spamd with the -D > option; let me know if there's some other way I should be doing it. :-) > I wouldn't use spamd for debugging unless you need to debug soemthing in spamd. Run spamassassin -D and look for SURBL rules spit out. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
