On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 6:19:06 AM, Robert Brooks wrote: > David B Funk wrote: >> I'm seeing a new spam varient that is clearly designed to get >> past SURBL. It is an HTML message that contains many (50~100) >> 'invisible' links; links that have no target text, just: >> <A href="http://garbage.sitename.tld";></A>
>> Is it time to create rules to penalize large numbers of 'invisible' >> links? > it would also be good to discard pointless links before querying > surbl's, not sure how easy that is going to be to code though Yes, there is a SpamAssassin bugzilla with a feature request to ignore unclickable URIs: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3976 Jeff C. -- "If it appears in hams, then don't list it."
