On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 8:42:17 AM, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 10:58 AM 2/22/2005, Marc Perkel wrote: >>First I would recomment you upgrade to Spam Assassin 3.x - It's much better.
> Good point Marc, that's a better solution in general. I do recommend that > over my previous advice of just adding antidrug.cf. > However, if they are stuck on 2.64 due to perl versions or some such thing, > adding antidrug.cf and Mail::SpamCopURI covers a lot of the problem cases > for 2.64. Yes, both Mail::SpamCopURI and SA 3.X use SURBLs. If the spams Nate is seeing contain URIs (web site links), then SURBL use will probably catch them. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
