Update: this is resolved after quick response by Mark Martinec to a post to the amavis-users list.
The issue was that I'd changed my postifx config to do address mappings after the content filter instead of before, so amavisd-new was seeing non-local domains and not adding the X-Spam headers to those messages. Reverting the postfix config has made everything happy again. Thanks, Bryan On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:23:16 -0500, Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Howdy, > > I'm having an issue which may be with SpamAssassin or may be with > amavisd-new -- feel free to point me elsewhere if this isn't a SA > problem. > > I'm using: > > FreeBSD 5-STABLE from 20050213 > Relevent ports: > perl-5.8.6_2 > amavisd-new-2.2.1_1,1 > p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2_1 > postfix-2.1.5_1,1 > > Generally speaking, things are all working well, except that just this > week some messages are identified as spam by amavisd-new but don't > have X-Spam headers when they're finally delivered. I've turned on > headers for mail with a score over -999, so all mail should have it. > All mail does have the X-Virus-Scanned header. > > Here's an example from a non-spam message: > ===== > maillog: > Feb 22 14:08:32 mailbox amavis[93565]: (93565-01-10) Passed CLEAN, > [205.207.28.76] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: -5.899, 1587 ms > > x-headers: > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, > BAYES_00 > X-Spam-Level: > ===== > > Here's an example of a spam message which has proper headers: > ===== > maillog: > Feb 22 14:03:25 mailbox amavis[93565]: (93565-01) Passed SPAM, > [64.236.24.28] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: 9.983, 1934 > ms > > x-headers: > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com > X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=BAYES_99, > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RCVD_IN_DSBL, RCVD_IN_XBL > X-Spam-Level: ********* > X-Spam-Flag: YES > ===== > > And here's an example of a spam message with no headers: > ===== > maillog: > Feb 22 13:50:04 mailbox amavis[40756]: (40756-02-8) Passed SPAM, > [68.114.69.46] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hits: 27.676, 3858 ms > > x-headers: > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mailbox.samurai.com > ===== > > I did upgrade to perl 5.8.6_2 and SA 3.02_1 (FreeBSD port versions) in > the past couple of days. > > Any ideas where I should look to debug this? Any additional details > you'd like me to post? > > Thanks, > Bryan >
